Nature & Environment
Scientist Discovers Extremely Rare Bird and Then Kills It: The Controversy
Catherine Griffin
First Posted: Oct 13, 2015 06:31 AM EDT
It might be all in the name of science, but that doesn't mean that there isn't controversy. A scientist discovered a rare bird that hadn't been seen in over a century, and then killed it for a museum collection.
The bird, in this case, is called the Moustached Kingfisher. With its brilliant blue, white and orange feathers, it certainly stands out in a photograph.
"Described by a single female specimen in the 1920s, two more females brought to collectors by local hunters in the early 1950s, and only glimpsed in the wild once," wrote Christopher Filardi of the American Museum of Natural History. "Scientists have never observed a male. Its voice and habits are poorly known. Given its history of eluding detection, realistic hopes of finding the bird were slim."
That's exactly what Filardi managed to do, though. He set nets on the island of Guadalcanal and managed to captured a male bird with an all-blue back and an orange face. Once captured, though, Filardi then killed the bird for further study.
While "collecting" birds is a usual scientific practice, outrage ensued.
"To search for and find an animal of a rare species-an individual with feelings, interests, a home, and perhaps a mate-only to kill him is perverse, cruel, and the sort of act that has led to the extinction of other animals who were also viewed as 'specimens,'" said Colleen O'Brien, PETA Senior Director, in an interview with the NY Daily News. "All that was needed to document this rare bird was compassion, awe, and a camera, not disregard and a death warrant."
Of course, this specimen also means that scientists have a comprehensive set for molecular, morphological, toxicological and plumage studies that are unavailable from blood samples, individual feathers, or photographs. Still, though, there are those who say that the population, which is estimated to be between 250 and 1,000 individuals, is too fragile to have taken this particular bird as a specimen.
It's clear that the debate will continue, especially when considering the historical fall of the great auk, which was hunted to extinction due to demand for specimens.
Whether or not Filardi was "right" in his collect will likely continue to be argued from both sides.
Related Stories
World's Tiniest, Free-Living Insect Discovered Feasting on Fungi
Ecotourism May Put Wild Animals at Risk as the Business Booms
For more great science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).
See Now:
NASA's Juno Spacecraft's Rendezvous With Jupiter's Mammoth Cyclone
©2024 ScienceWorldReport.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission. The window to the world of science news.
More on SCIENCEwr
First Posted: Oct 13, 2015 06:31 AM EDT
It might be all in the name of science, but that doesn't mean that there isn't controversy. A scientist discovered a rare bird that hadn't been seen in over a century, and then killed it for a museum collection.
The bird, in this case, is called the Moustached Kingfisher. With its brilliant blue, white and orange feathers, it certainly stands out in a photograph.
"Described by a single female specimen in the 1920s, two more females brought to collectors by local hunters in the early 1950s, and only glimpsed in the wild once," wrote Christopher Filardi of the American Museum of Natural History. "Scientists have never observed a male. Its voice and habits are poorly known. Given its history of eluding detection, realistic hopes of finding the bird were slim."
That's exactly what Filardi managed to do, though. He set nets on the island of Guadalcanal and managed to captured a male bird with an all-blue back and an orange face. Once captured, though, Filardi then killed the bird for further study.
While "collecting" birds is a usual scientific practice, outrage ensued.
"To search for and find an animal of a rare species-an individual with feelings, interests, a home, and perhaps a mate-only to kill him is perverse, cruel, and the sort of act that has led to the extinction of other animals who were also viewed as 'specimens,'" said Colleen O'Brien, PETA Senior Director, in an interview with the NY Daily News. "All that was needed to document this rare bird was compassion, awe, and a camera, not disregard and a death warrant."
Of course, this specimen also means that scientists have a comprehensive set for molecular, morphological, toxicological and plumage studies that are unavailable from blood samples, individual feathers, or photographs. Still, though, there are those who say that the population, which is estimated to be between 250 and 1,000 individuals, is too fragile to have taken this particular bird as a specimen.
It's clear that the debate will continue, especially when considering the historical fall of the great auk, which was hunted to extinction due to demand for specimens.
Whether or not Filardi was "right" in his collect will likely continue to be argued from both sides.
Related Stories
World's Tiniest, Free-Living Insect Discovered Feasting on Fungi
Ecotourism May Put Wild Animals at Risk as the Business Booms
For more great science stories and general news, please visit our sister site, Headlines and Global News (HNGN).
See Now: NASA's Juno Spacecraft's Rendezvous With Jupiter's Mammoth Cyclone